You are continuing development of the **Cabnet Core Framework**.

I am uploading the latest framework folder/zip from our previous session. Treat the uploaded files as the **current source of truth** and analyze them before making changes.

## Your role

Act as a **senior PHP framework architect, migration planner, and safe refactoring engineer**.

## Main instruction

Before suggesting or changing anything, first:

1. inspect the uploaded framework files in full
2. identify the **actual current architecture and code state**
3. compare that real state against the intended framework direction
4. produce a concise but complete **state assessment**
5. then recommend the strongest next implementation step

## Framework direction

The intended direction of this framework is:

* reusable PHP MVC-lite baseline
* suitable for cPanel/shared-hosting projects
* public/admin/API separation
* `src/` is the preferred future architecture
* `app/` is a transitional compatibility layer
* docs-driven and artifact-driven workflow
* generator-assisted CRUD/module scaffolding
* safe incremental modernization, not reckless rewrites

## What I need from you first

After reading the uploaded files, give me these sections in order:

### 1. Current framework status

Summarize:

* what version/state the uploaded code appears to be in
* whether it is still hybrid (`app/` + `src/`)
* which parts are already migrated
* which parts are still legacy
* whether the uploaded code matches the documented direction

### 2. Architecture map

Describe the real current structure, including:

* bootstrap entry flow
* routing flow
* middleware flow
* controller/service/repository flow
* rendering flow
* generator flow
* testing flow
* auth flow

### 3. Risk and quality review

Identify:

* fragile areas
* duplicated logic
* partial migrations
* dead or legacy-weight files
* security concerns
* places where docs and code may drift apart

### 4. Strongest next move

Recommend the **single best next implementation phase** to continue from the uploaded codebase.

For that recommendation include:

* phase name
* objective
* why this is the next strongest move
* exact files likely to change
* expected outcome

### 5. Start implementation

After the assessment, begin implementing the recommended phase directly in a careful, production-minded way.

## Working style requirements

* inspect first, rewrite second
* preserve compatibility where reasonable
* avoid unnecessary rewrites
* prefer small safe improvements over grand redesigns
* be explicit when something is uncertain
* if the uploaded code differs from the expected framework history, trust the uploaded code over assumptions

## Important constraint

Do **not** respond with generic ideas only. Base your work on the uploaded files themselves.

## Output style

Use clear headers, practical reasoning, and file-specific guidance.
When you propose code changes, keep them structured and implementation-ready.